Here is my delayed report on February's Meeting for Sufferings, which I believe is my penultimate meeting since my 3 years is up in May. Having only just resubscribed to The Friend, I'm only vaguely aware that at the time a shitestorm was going on about Christocentric vs. Atheist/Universalist/Other or something. Not sure if this was related to the discussion Sufferings was having about the BYM submission to the World Council of Churches on the 'Nature and Mission of the Church'.
It seems that the WCC asks all it's participants* to send similar reports about once a decade. Whether the WCC ever contributes anything to BYM or the world that would justify the trouble it puts us to was never explained. In this case, the Committee for Christian & Interfaith Relations took on the task of drafting this document and clearly worked extremely hard on it. The Nature & Mission report had to follow a strict template that involved some very high church jargon in Greek. The fact that this language didn't speak to our condition seemed to very much bother some Friends, but I found it interesting as well as challenging to get my head around. Having said that though, the CCIR responses to the WCC questions were disingenuous at best. They simply and blatantly did not reflect the actual experience of Quakerism in Britain in 2009.
I felt resentment that the authors clearly had some agenda and persisted with it even after Sufferings asked for a redraft. At the February meeting, we had to make a decision on the report one way or another. The discussion on the redraft was fraught. At one point, we were about to send the report to the WCC without actually endorsing it, which I think made us all feel rather dirty so over an extended period we swung right back to accepting the thing in spite of it giving a picture of British Quakers that we knew to be false. It was all pretty unpleasant.
Ultimately of course, it was also irrelevant since no one in BYM will see the report ever again at least until 100 years from now or whenever the WCC asks us to do an updated one. A couple of folks at Sufferings in the know told me that our response could help other churches with their constitutional problems and will also somehow filter down through local Churches Together work. I can imagine if a member of another church said to me, 'I found your WCC response so helpful when my parish was debating women priests' or something, the most I would want to say is, 'oh, that's nice'.
Actually, I doubt we are the only WCC participant who had these kinds of problems stating what we believe in that context, and another Sufferings member told me that the WCC knows the truth about BYM anyway - that we are pretty universalist these days and the other folks at the Geneva meetings don't mind and accept us that way. I don't know whether that makes our endorsement of the report better or worse.
* Britain Yearly Meeting isn't a 'member' of the WCC because we don't do creeds, but we are involved through our involvement of Churches Together in Britain & Ireland.
Next weekend's Sufferings looks pretty interesting since we'll be talking about what Quakers are up to around the world and about how BYM is being affected by the recession.
After that, it's my 3 years up on Sufferings on behalf of Young Friends General Meeting. Best of luck to my successor who I'm told will stir things up a bit.
With all those Saturdays I'll have free now, there is the question of will I put that back into Quaker work, spend more time with my dog or make some other contribution to the world? I've been increasingly involved in workers rights stuff, having joined the
Wobblies and got involved in
Solfed. What with the recession, this sort of thing could keep me rather busy.